Puromycin technology for in vitro evolution and proteome exploration
Etsuko Miyamoto-Sato* & Hiroshi YanagawaDepartment of Biosciences and Informatics, Faculty of Science and Technology,
Keio University, Yokohama 223-8522, Japan.
*Correspondence should be addressed to E. Miyamoto-Sato.
e-mail: nekoneko @ e du c .c c.k ei o.ac.jp
(Received 1 November, 2006 Accepted 9 November, 2006)
AbstractPuromycin, an analogue of the 3’ end of aminoacyl-tRNA, is transferred non-specifically to growing polypeptide chains, causing premature termination of translation. However, we found that, at very low concentration, puromycin is transferred specifically to the carboxyl (C-) terminus of the full-length protein. The term puromycin technology refers to methods which have been developed based on this property, including the in vitro virus (IVV) display technique, in which an mRNA (genotype) and its protein (phenotype) are linked via puromycin, and the technique of specific in vitro C-terminal protein labeling. Novel and convenient applications based on puromycin technology have been employed not only for evolutionary protein engineering, such as protein-directed selection, but also in various fields of proteomics research, such as fluorescence labeling, affinity purification (pull-down assay), protein-protein interaction analysis, and protein chips. Here, we review the properties of puromycin that make this technology possible, and the already extensive range of applications of this technology.
Kyewords: puromycine, evolution, proteome, in vitro virus (IVV), C-terminal protein labeling
IntroductionPuromycin is a very powerful inhibitor of protein synthesis in both in vivo and in vitro translation systems [1-8]. Structurally, it resembles the 3' end of an aminoacyl-tRNA molecule , and it is able to enter the ribosomal A site to be transferred to nascent polypeptide chains by peptidyl transferase [9-11]. However, we showed that, at very low concentration in a cell-free translation system, puromycin is transferred specifically to the C-terminal of the full-length protein . We utilized this finding to link mRNA and protein to form a so-called in vitro virus (IVV) for evolutionary protein engineering . The IVV provides a system for mRNA display, in which a genotype molecule (mRNA) is linked to the corresponding phenotype molecule (protein) through puromycin in a cell-free translation system (Figure 1A) [13-14]. We also utilized the same property of puromycin to develop a highly specific labeling system for proteins, in which puromycin derivatives bearing a fluorescein moiety are used to label the C-terminal end of a full-length protein (Figure 1B) [14-15].
The development of proteomics has led to an increasing interest in cell-free translation systems, because of their rapidity and ease of handling. Several new in vitro protein production technologies yielding large amounts of protein have been developed [16-17], and in combination with puromycin technology, have been utilized for evolutionary protein engineering [13-14, 18], as well as in proteomics. Recently, in vitro protein selection using mRNA display methods such as IVV [19-21] and RNA-peptide fusions [22-23] have been employed for the analysis of protein-protein interactions using cDNA libraries. This display technology for protein selection and screening has already achieved spectacular results. Moreover, we have reported various other applications, including in vitro analyses of protein-protein interactions using C-terminally labeled proteins with microarrays and fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy (FCCS) [24-25]. Here we present an overview of the present status and prospects of puromycin technology.
Figure 1. Puromycin technology; the C-terminal protein labeling and IVV methods. (A) IVV formation on the ribosome (1). Puromycin at the 3’-terminal end of a spacer (Fluor-PEG Puro; 14) ligated to mRNA can enter the ribosomal A-site to bind covalently to the C-terminal end of the encoded full-length protein in the ribosomal P-site. Fluor stands for fluorescein. Puro represents puromycin. (B) C-Terminal labeling of proteins on the ribosome (14,15). A puromycin derivative (Fluor-dCpuro; 16) can enter the ribosomal A-site to bind covalently to the C-terminal end of the protein in the ribosomal P-site.
1. Puromycin technologyThe antibiotic puromycin , which is an analogue of the 3’ end of Tyr-tRNATyr , acts in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes [3-5] as an inhibitor of peptidyl transferase [6-7]. It has two modes of inhibitory action. The first is by acting as an acceptor substrate which attacks peptidyl-tRNA (donor substrate) in the P site to form a nascent peptide [6-9]. The second is by competing with aminoacyl-tRNA for binding to the A’ site, which is the binding site of the 3’ end of aminoacyl-tRNA within the peptidyl transferase active site [10-12]. It has been reported that the polypeptides released by puromycin are not full-length protein . Similarly, it has been shown that growing peptide chains on ribosomes are transferred to the α-amino group of puromycin, which interrupts the normal reaction of peptide bond formation . Therefore, these conventional studies suggested that puromycin is a non-specific inhibitor of protein synthesis as a result of competition with aminoacyl-tRNA. However, since most of the studies on puromycin were performed at relatively high concentrations, the behavior of puromycin at lower concentrations was still an open question at that time. It had been reported that full-length protein which fails to be released from ribosomes at the final stage of protein synthesis, requires treatment with puromycin or RFs to be released [26-27]. These results led us to hypothesize that puromycin at very low concentrations, which would not effectively compete with aminoacyl-tRNA , might act as a non-inhibitor and bond specifically to full-length protein at the stop codon.
Indeed, we confirmed that puromycin and its derivatives bond only to full-length protein at very low concentrations (such as 0.04 µM), where they are “non-inhibitors” of protein synthesis, by using 32P-labeled rCpPuro (2’-ribocytidylyl-(3'→5')-puromycin) in an E. coli S30 extract cell-free translation system . Our results provided the first evidence that specific bonding of puromycin to the full-length protein occurs at the stop codon during the process of termination of protein synthesis at very low concentration. In other words, puromycin at sufficiently low concentrations only has the opportunity to be bonded to proteins at a stop codon, where it does not need to compete with aminoacyl-tRNA. Since termination is a relatively slow step involving a translational pause in eukaryotes [28-29] and E. coli , it is possible that puromycin even at very low concentrations can bind to the A' site, and compete with RFs to release the full-length protein from ribosomes. Accordingly, under these conditions, puromycin can be incorporated specifically at the C-terminus of the full-length protein. This concept is the basis of puromycin technology [12,14]. The combination of this puromycin technology with in vitro translation has yielded novel methods, such as IVV and C-terminal labeling techniques, for protein selection and screening [19-21], fluorescence labeling [19-21], and affinity purification (pull-down assay), as well as protein chips for proteomics [24,25], and superior methods for evolutionary protein engineering.
2. In vitro virus; IVV
For Darwinian evolution, genotype assignment to the phenotype is essential. Evolutionary molecular engineering through in vitro RNA selection using ribozyme-type assignment molecules was proposed [31-33] and shown to be effective [34-35]. However, greater progress has been achieved with in vitro protein selection using fusion-type assignment molecules, in which genotype molecules are bound to phenotype molecules, such as ribosome display , mRNA display, including IVV [12-14,18], and DNA display [37-38], based on cell-free translation systems. Since these display technologies are in vitro versions of phage display , permitting global search of a large sequence space, such as the whole protein sequence space.
We developed IVV, the first application of puromycin technology, for mRNA display in 1997 . Shortly thereafter, RNA-peptide fusions were independently reported for mRNA display . The principle of puromycin technology has been applied in both methods, which are based on the use of puromycin as a physical linkage between mRNA and its encoded full-length protein to obtain assignment molecules. These methods have already achieved substantial results, though early work uncovered some problems in obtaining large libraries and highly efficient enrichment, as well as involving rather tedious processes [13,18]. The efficiency of the ligation between the mRNA and the puromycin spacer was initially very low (about 20-30%), but this was improved (to about 70%) by alternative ligation methods such as splint ligation  and photo-linked ligation . Further, we have reported a highly efficient single-strand ligation (over 90%) using a fluorescein-conjugated polyethylene glycol puromycin spacer (PEG-Puro spacer; Figure 2A) . The efficiency of fusion formation was initially less than 10%  or 1% , but this has been improved to 40% [39, 42-43]. In our experiments, we have obtained more than 70% fusion formation  through single-strand ligation using a flexible PEG-Puro spacer and an optimized mRNA template in a cell-free wheat germ translation system or rabbit reticulocyte lysate translation system.
We also demonstrated that single-strand ligation using the flexible fluorescein-conjugated PEG-Puro spacer (Figure 2B) instead of DNA [13,18] or triethylene glycol (TEG)  spacer provides an improvement of mRNA stability and IVV formation . Moreover, we found that mRNA having a 5’-untranslated region including SP6 promoter and Ω29 enhancer (a part of tobacco mosaic virus Ω), and an A8 sequence (eight consecutive adenylate residues) without a stop codon at the 3’ end is suitable for fusion formation . The use of mRNA without a stop codon is preferable to establish fusions of mRNA and its encoded peptide or protein, because this avoids competition of puromycin with RFs [12,13]. Optimization of the 5’- and 3’-terminal sequences of mRNA templates offers the advantage of easy handling because of high efficiency of IVV formation, simplifying formerly tedious processes.
Figure 2. PEG puromycin spacer for the IVV method and puromycin analogues for the C-terminal protein labeling method. (A) The structure of PEG puromycin spacer. Fluor-PEG Puro spacer [p(dCp)2-T(Fluor)p-PEGp-(dCp)2-puromycin] was synthesized from Puro(Fmoc)-CPG, Polyethylene glycol (PEG, average mol. wt 2,000), deoxycytidine phosphoramidite (dC-amidite), thymidine(fluorescein) phosphoramidite [T(Fluor)-amidite]. (B) The structure of fluorescence-labeled puromycin. A fluorophore (herein, fluorescein) was chemically joined to puromycin through a dC linker.
3. In vitro evolution and proteome explorationIn vitro display technology has many advantages . It offers a greater library diversity (1012-13/ml) compared with phage display . In fact, various aptamers have been successfully evolved from random libraries using this approach [45-48]. Evolution of antibody mimics by using mRNA display  or ribosome display  and identification of epitope-like consensus motifs  have also been reported. Screening for binding streptavidin aptamer provided 10,000-fold stronger binding than that obtained with the in vivo method , supporting the superiority of the method. Screening for ATP binding also gave good results . In many cases, desired functional peptides or proteins have been obtained by the application of display technology.
mRNA display methods, including IVV, have been successfully used to analyze protein-protein interactions (PPI) [19-22], and drug-protein interactions , starting from a cDNA library. In order to adapt the technology to protein function research, such as PPI analysis, in vivo preparation of bait proteins used to be required before in vitro-based manipulation [22-23]. Our developed cell-free cotranslation technique with IVV (Figure 3) has provided a totally in vitro manipulation that is suitable for high-throughput, genome-wide analysis with multiple bait proteins as a result of in vitro bait translation instead of in vivo bait preparation . Cotranslation of bait and prey proteins should also be advantageous for the formation of protein complexes [55-56]. This approach currently appears to offer the best opportunity to obtain a comprehensive data set including not only direct, but also indirect interactions in a single experiment.
The display technology can also be applied to protein chip systems. A microarray in which mRNA-peptide fusions are immobilized by hybridization to a surface-bound DNA capture probe has been developed, resulting in an addressable mRNA-peptide fusion microarray . This provides a protein chip in which the protein is linked to its genetic information. This system can be used to analyze genetic information associated with interactions of a large-diversity protein library versus a large-diversity library of nucleotides, sugars, etc. This is potentially a high-throughput method, which should contribute greatly to proteomics. Epitope-mRNA fusions have been bound to the surface and the interaction with fluorescence-labeled antibody has been analyzed .
|Figure 3. IVV selection based on cell-free cotranslation. The selection procedure is composed of (I) transcription, (II) cell-free cotranslation, coupling translation and interaction of tagged bait protein and prey IVV library to form complexes, (III) IVV two-step selection (Rigaut et al. 1999), and (IV) RT-PCR to amplify the library. IgG beads (IgG) for the protein A (zz domain) tag are used for the 1st step of the purification, and calmodulin beads (Cal) for the calmodulin binding protein (CBP) tag are used for the 2nd step of the purification.
4. Full-length protein labeling at the C-terminal endAs already mentioned, puromycin and its derivatives at low concentrations can bind specifically to the carboxyl terminus of full-length proteins  and a fluorescein-puromycin conjugate has been successfully used for the C-terminal fluorescein labeling of proteins . This fluorescence-labeling method is useful for analyzing protein-protein or protein-DNA interactions with DNA microarrays or with fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy (FCCS), and for pull-down assay .
The efficiency of C-terminal labeling is reported to be between 50% and 95% . To confirm the general utility of this labeling method, we chemically synthesized various puromycin analogs in which one or two (deoxy)cytidylic acid(s) (i.e., dC, dCdC, rC, or rCrC) were inserted between the fluorophore (fluorescein, RhG, TAMRA, Cy3, or Cy5) and puromycin as a linker to enhance the incorporation of puromycin analogs into proteins by mimicking the CCA sequence at the 3’ end of tRNA . These puromycin analogs were added to the wheat germ in vitro translation system . Among them, we found that the Fluor-dC-puromycin conjugates (Figure 2B) gave the best yield because of the use of the dC linker. The dC linker should be inferior as an inhibitor to the rC linker in the middle of protein synthesis and superior to the rC linker as a non-inhibitor for specific bonding to the full-length protein in the final stage of protein synthesis. In addition, we have optimized an mRNA template having a certain sequence at the 3’ end (XA8 sequence; XhoI and eight consecutive adenylate residues) to provide 3- to 5-fold higher formation efficiency of C-terminally labeled proteins . We concluded that mRNA templates with the XA8 sequence as a 3’end and SP6 + Ω29 as a 5’ UTR are clearly preferable for the C-terminal labeling of proteins to facilitate high-throughput proteome exploration.
5. Proteome exploration using c-terminal protein labelingThis C-terminus labeling method has many advantages. Because the protein is labeled only at the C-terminus, most proteins can maintain their functionality. The method is suitable for quantitative analysis because there is a single fluorophore on each protein molecule. The effect of labeling on the protein activity should be smaller than with the GFP fusion method, because of the much smaller size of the label. We have shown that C-terminal fluorescence labeling is very useful for many applications, including detection of protein-protein or protein-DNA interactions with a DNA microarray or with FCCS, and pull-down assay [24-25].
Recently, the C-terminal labeling method has been applied to observe protein expression in vivo [58-59]. The X-dC-puromycin conjugates bearing various fluorescent and biotin moieties (Figure 2B) have been shown to be a new class of reagents for studying protein expression not only in vitro, but also in vivo . These compounds are readily incorporated into expressed protein products in cell lysates in vitro and efficiently cross the cell membrane to function in protein synthesis in vivo. This method was used to examine whether dopamine receptor activation stimulates local protein synthesis in living cells . The system enables direct monitoring and imaging of protein expression with fluorescent puromycin-labeled protein, and has the potential to provide high spatial and temporal resolution in living cells.
Conclusions and outlookPuromycin technology in combination with cell-free translation systems allows the processing of huge libraries, is not limited by cellular transformations, and is not biased by in vivo environments. In vitro display technologies using this approach for mRNA display, such as IVV, have proved to be valuable tools for many applications other than merely selecting polypeptide binders. They have great potential for directed evolution of protein stability and affinity, for the selection of enzymatic activities, antibodies, and functional peptides from random-peptide libraries, and for proteomics research, including protein-protein interactions, drug-protein interactions, and potentially DNA-protein interactions from cDNA libraries. The C-terminal protein labeling technology is very useful for analyzing protein-protein or protein-DNA interactions with DNA microarrays or with FCCS in model systems, and is expected to have wide applicability. Thus, puromycin technology is considered to be a next-generation technology that will have a great impact in many areas of biotechnology, medicine and proteomics.
AcknowledgementsWe thank Dr. M. Ishizaka and S. Fujimori for useful discussions. Also, we thank N. Hirai and K. Masuoka for experimental assistances. This work was supported in part by a grant of the Genome Network Project from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
References1. Yarmolinsky, M.B. and De La Haba, G.L. Inhibition by puromycin of amino acid incorporation into protein, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 45, 1721-1729 (1959).
2. Morris, A., Favelukes, S., Arlinghaus, R., Schweet, R. Mechanism of puromycin inhibition of hemoglobin synthesis, Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 7, 326-30 (1962).
3. Ferguson, J.J. Protein synthesis and adrenocorticotropin responsiveness, J Biol Chem. 238, 2754-9 (1963).
4. Nemeth, A.M. and de la Haba, G.L. The effect of puromycin on the developmental and adaptive formation of tryptophan pyrrolase, J. Biol. Chem. 237, 1190- 1193 (1962).
5. Allen, D. W. and Zamecnik, P.C. The effect of puromycin on rabbit reticulocyte ribosomes, Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 55, 865-874 (1962).
6. Nathans, D. Puromycin inhibition of protein synthesis: incorporation of puromycin into peptide chains, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 51, 585-592 (1964).
7. Traut, R.R. and Monro, R.E. The puromycin reaction and its relation to protein synthesis, J. Mol. Biol. 10, 63-72 (1964).
8. Zamir, A., Leder, P. and Elson, D.A ribosome-catalyzed reaction between N-formylmethionyl-tRNA and puromycin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 56, 1794-1801 (1966).
9. Nathans, D. and Neidle, A. Structural requirements for puromycin inhibition of protein synthesis, Nature 197, 1076-1077 (1963).
10. Steiner, G., Kuechler, E. and Barta, A. Photoaffinity labeling of peptidyltransferase, EMBO J. 7, 3949-3955 (1988).
11. Kirillov, S., Porse, B. T., Vester, B., Woolley, P. and Garrett, R. A. Movement of the 3'-end of tRNA through the peptidyl transferase centre and its inhibition by antibiotics, FEBS Lett. 406, 223-233 (1997).
12. Miyamoto-Sato, E., Nemoto, N., Kobayashi, K. and Yanagawa, H. Specific bonding of puromycin to full-length protein at the C-terminus, Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 1176-1182 (2000).
13. Nemoto, N., Miyamoto-Sato, E., Husimi, Y. and Yanagawa, H. In vitro virus: bonding of mRNA bearing puromycin at the 3'-terminal end to the C-terminal end of its encoded protein on the ribosome in vitro, FEBS Lett. 414, 405-408 (1997).
14. Miyamoto-Sato, E., Takashima, H., Fuse, S., Sue, K., Ishizaka, M., Tateyama, S., Horisawa, K., Sawasaki, T., Endo, Y. and Yanagawa, H. Highly stable and efficient mRNA templates for mRNA-protein fusions and C-terminally labeled proteins, Nucleic Acids Res. 31, e78 (2003).
15. Nemoto, N., Miyamoto-Sato, E. and Yanagawa, H. Fluorescence labeling of the C-terminus of proteins with a puromycin analogue in cell-free translation systems, FEBS Lett. 462, 43-46 (1999).
16. Kigawa, T., Yabuki, T., Yoshida, Y., Tsutsui, M., Ito, Y., Shibata, T. and Yokoyama, S. Cell-free production and stable-isotope labeling of milligram quantities of proteins, FEBS Lett. 442, 15-19 (1999).
17. Madin, K., Sawasaki, T., Ogasawara, T. and Endo, Y. A highly efficient and robust cell-free protein synthesis system prepared from wheat embryos: plants apparently contain a suicide system directed at ribosomes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 559-564 (2000).
18. Roberts, R. W. and Szostak, J. W. RNA-peptide fusions for the in vitro selection of peptides and proteins, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 12297-12302 (1997).
19. Miyamoto-Sato, E., Ishizaka, M., Horisawa, K., Tateyama, S., Takashima, H., Fuse, S., Sue, K., Hirai, N., Masuoka, K. and Yanagawa, H. Cell-free cotranslation and selection using in vitro virus for high-throughput analysis of protein-protein interactions and complexes, Genome Res. 15, 710-717 (2005).
20. Horisawa, K., Tateyama, S., Ishizaka, M., Matsumura, N., Takashima, H., Miyamoto-Sato, E., Doi, N. and Yanagawa, H. In vitro selection of Jun-associated proteins using mRNA display, Nucleic Acids Res. 32, e169 (2004).
21. Miyamoto-Sato, E. and Yanagawa, H. Toward functional analysis of protein interactome using "in vitro virus": in silico analyses of Fos/Jun interactors, Journal of Drug Targeting 14, 505-11 (2006).
22. Hammond, P.W., Alpin, J., Rise, C.E., Wright, M. and Kreider,B. L. In vitro selection and characterization of Bcl-X(L)-binding proteins from a mix of tissue-specific mRNA display libraries, J. Biol. Chem. 276, 20898-20906 (2001).
23. Shen, X., Valencia, C.A., Szostak, J.W., Dong, B. and Liu, R. Scanning the human proteome for calmodulin-binding proteins, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5969-5974 (2005).
24. Doi, N., Takashima, H., Kinjo, M., Sakata, K., Kawahashi, Y., Oishi, Y., Oyama, R., Miyamoto-Sato, E., Sawasaki, T., Endo, Y. and Yanagawa, H. Novel fluorescence labeling and high-throughput assay technologies for in vitro analysis of protein interactions, Genome Res. 12, 487-492 (2002).
25. Kawahashi, Y. Doi, N., Takashima, H., Tsuda, C., Oishi, Y., Oyama, R., Yonezawa, M., Miyamoto-Sato, E. and Yanagawa, H. In vitro protein microarrays for detecting protein-protein interactions: application of a new method for fluorescence labeling of proteins, Proteomics. 3, 1236-1243 (2003).
26. Kudlicki, W., Odom, O.W., Kramer, G. and Hardesty, B. Binding of an N-terminal rhodanese peptide to DnaJ and to ribosomes, J. Biol. Chem. 269, 16549-16553 (1994).
27. Hardesty, B., Kudlicki, W., Odom, O.W., Zhang, T., McCarthy, D. and Kramer, G. Cotranslational folding of nascent proteins on Escherichia coli ribosomes. Biochem, Cell. Biol. 73, 1199-1207 (1995). 28. Wolin, S.L. and Walter, P. Ribosome pausing and stacking during translation of a eukaryotic mRNA, EMBO J. 7, 3559-3569 (1988). 29. Lodish, H.F. and Jacobsen, M. Regulation of hemoglobin synthesis. Equal rates of translation and termination of - and -globin chains, J. Biol. Chem. 247, 3622-3629 (1972).
30. Bjornsson, A and Isaksson, L.A. Accumulation of a mRNA decay intermediate by ribosomal pausing at a stop codon, Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 1753-1757 (1996).
31. Cech, T.R., Zaug, A.J. and Grabowski, P.J. In vitro splicing of the ribosomal RNA precursor of Tetrahymena: involvement of a guanosine nucleotide in the excision of the intervening sequence, Cell 27, 487-496 (1981).
32. Eigen, M. New concepts for dealing with the evolution of nucleic acids, Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 52, 307-20 (1987).
33. Gilbert, W. Origin of life: The RNA world, Nature 319, 618-620 (1986).
34. Joyce, G.F. Amplification, mutation and selection of catalytic RNA, Gene 82, 83-87 (1989).
35. Szostak, J. W. and Ellington, A.D., In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands, Nature 346, 818-822 (1990).
36. Hanes, J. and Plückthun, A. In vitro selection and evolution of functional proteins by using ribosome display, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 4937-4942 (1997).
37. Doi, N. and Yanagawa, H. STABLE: protein-DNA fusion system for screening of combinatorial protein libraries in vitro, FEBS Lett. 457,227-230 (1999).
38. Tabuchi, I., Soramoto, S., Nemoto, N., Husimi, Y. An in vitro DNA virus for in vitro protein evolution, FEBS Lett. 508, 309-312 (2001).
39. Smith, G. P. Filamentous fusion phage: novel expression vectors that display cloned antigens on the virion surface, Science 228, 1315-1317 (1985).
40. Liu, R., Barrick, J.E., Szostak, J.W. and Roberts, R.W. Optimized synthesis of RNA-protein fusions for in vitro protein selection, Methods Enzymol. 318, 268-293 (2000).
41. Kurz, M., Gu, K. and Lohse, P. A. Psoralen photo-crosslinked mRNA-puromycin conjugates: a novel template for the rapid and facile preparation of mRNA-protein fusions, Nucleic Acids Res. 28, e83. 42. Roberts, R.W. Totally in vitro protein selection using mRNA-protein fusions and ribosome display, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1999, 3, 268-273 (2000).
43. Barrick, J. E., Takahashi, T.T., Balakin, A. and Roberts, R. W. Selection of RNA-binding peptides using mRNA-peptide fusions, Methods 23, 287-293 (2001).
44. Amstutz, P., Forrer ,P., Zahnd, C. and Plückthun, A. In vitro display technologies: novel developments and applications, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 12, 400-405 (2001).
45. Wilson, D.S., Keefe, A.D. and Szostak, J.W. In vitro display technologies: novel developments and applications, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 3750-3755 (2001).
46. Keefe, A.D. and Szostak, J.W. Functional proteins from a random-sequence library, Nature 410, 715-718 (2001).
47. Barrick, J.E., Takahashi, T.T., Ren, J., Xia, T. and Roberts, R. W. Large libraries reveal diverse solutions to an RNA recognition problem, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 12374-12378 (2001).
48. Cujec, T.P., Medeiros, P.F., Hammond, P., Rise, C. and Kreider, B.L. selection of v-abl tyrosine kinase substrate sequences from randomized peptide and cellular proteomic libraries using mRNA display, Chem. Biol. 9, 253-264 (2002).
49. Xu, L., Aha, P., Gu, K., Kuimelis, R.G., Kurz, M., Lam, T., Lim, A.C., Liu, H., Lohse, P.A., Sun, L., Weng, S., Wagner, R.W., Lipovsek, D. Directed evolution of high-affinity antibody mimics using mRNA display, Chem. Biol. 9, 933-942 (2002).
50. Hanes ,J., Schaffitzel, C., Knappik, A. and Plückthun, A. Picomolar affinity antibodies from a fully synthetic naive library selected and evolved by ribosome display, Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 1287–1292 (2000).
51. Baggio, R., Burgstaller, P., Hale, S.P., Putney, A.R., Lane, M., Lipovsek, D., Wright, M.C., Roberts, R.W., Liu, R., Szostak, J.W. and Wagner, R.W. Identification of epitope-like consensus motifs using mRNA display, J. Mol. Recognit. 15, 126-134 (2002).
52. Li, S., Millward, S. and Roberts, R. In vitro selection of mRNA display libraries containing an unnatural amino acid, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 28, 9972-9973 (2002).
53. Wilson, D.S., Keefe, A.D. and Szostak, J.W. The use of mRNA display to select high-affinity protein-binding peptides, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 3750-3755 (2001).
54. McPherson, M., Yang, Y., Hammond, P.W. and Kreider, B. L., Drug receptor identification from multiple tissues using cellular-derived mRNA display libraries, Chem. Biol. 9, 691–698 (2002).
55. Fedorov, A.N. and Baldwin, T.O. Cotranslational protein folding, J. Biol. Chem. 272, 32715-32718 (1997).
56. Jermutus, L., Ryabova, L.A. and Plückthun, A. Recent advances in producing and selecting functional proteins by using cell-free translation, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 9, 534-548 (1998).
57. Weng, S., Gu, K., Hammond, P.W., Lohse, P., Rise, C., Wagner, R.W., Wright, M.C. and Kuimelis, R.G. Generating addressable protein microarrays with PROfusion covalent mRNA-protein fusion technology, Proteomics 2, 48-57 (2002).
58. Starck, S.R., Green, H.M., Alberola-Ila, J. and Roberts, R. W. A general approach to detect protein expression in vivo using fluorescent puromycin conjugates, Chem. Biol. 11, 999–1008 (2004).
59. Smith, W.B., Starck, S.R., Roberts, R.W. and Schuman, E. M. Dopaminergic stimulation of local protein synthesis enhances surface expression of GluR1 and synaptic transmission in hippocampal neurons, Neuron 45, 765–779 (2005).